نشریه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی آبیاری و آب ایران

نشریه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی آبیاری و آب ایران

بررسی عوامل دخیل در مدل بارش-روانابِ شماره منحنی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مهندسی عمران- دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان
2 گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز
10.22125/iwe.2024.413691.1742
چکیده
تخمین میزان رواناب سطحی و مطالعه رابطه بارش-رواناب مهم‌ترین موضوع در مطالعات هیدرولوژی آب‌های سطحی است. به کارگیری روش‌های ساده برای برآورد رواناب در کاربردهای هیدرولوژیکی به‌خصوص در حوضه‌های آبریز فاقد ایستگاه و آمار اندازه‌گیری از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. احتمالاً ساده‌ترین روش مفهومی برای پیش‌بینی رواناب استفاده از مدلِ بارش-رواناب شماره منحنی است که در اصل جهت مدل‌سازی میزان عمق رواناب ناشی از رگبارهای بارندگی در حوضه‌های آبریز کوچک کشاورزی و مراتع ایجاد شده است، اما تاکنون در انواع کاربردهایی غیر از آنچه در ابتدا در نظر گرفته شده بود استفاده شده است. مطالعه منابع مختلف نشان می‌دهد تحقیق در زمینه نحوه استفاده از این مدل همچنان در حال رشد و اصلاح بوده و نیاز به پیشرفت دارد. در پژوهش حاضر اولاً مروری بر مطالعاتی که به بررسی فاکتورهای دخیل در روش شماره منحنی برای برآورد میزان رواناب پرداخته‌اند، انجام شده که از نتایج اصلی این مطالعات میتوان به ارائه پیشنهاد تغییر مقدارِ نسبت تلفات اولیه استاندارد(یعنی تغییر عدد λ از عدد ۲/۰ به عدد ۰۵/۰) بر اساس اندازه‌گیری های گسترده میدانی و نیز لحاظ کردن کلاس‌های پاسخ بارندگی-رواناب در هنگام استفاده از روش شماره منحنی اشاره کرد ثانیاً به بعضی از چالش‌های باقی‌مانده و چشم‌انداز آینده در خصوص این روش اشاره شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the factors involved in the curve number rainfall-runoff model

نویسندگان English

Bahram Saeidi Farzad 1
Nazila kardan 2
1 Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
2 Department of Civil Eng., Azarbaijan Shahid Madani Univ., Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Estimating the amount of surface runoff and studying the relationship between rainfall and runoff is the most important issue in surface water hydrology studies. Using simple methods to estimate runoff in hydrological applications, especially in ungauged watersheds, is of particular importance. Probably the simplest conceptual method for predicting runoff depth is the use of the curve number rainfall-runoff model, which was originally developed to model the depth of runoff caused by rainstorms in small agricultural and rangeland catchments, but so far it has been applied in applications other than those originally intended. Various studies show that this method is still growing and improving and it needs to improve. In the present study, firstly, a review of the studies that investigated the factors involved in the curve number method to estimate the runoff value was done, and one of the main results of these studies is to suggest changing the value of the standard initial loss ratio (that is, changing the value of λ from 0.2 to 0.05) based on extensive field measurements and also considering rainfall-runoff response classes when using the curve number method. Secondly, some remaining challenges and future perspectives regarding this method are mentioned.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Curve number Model
Direct runoff
CN
Rainfall
runoff relation
علیزاده، ا. (1387). اصول هیدرولوژی کاربردی، انتشارات دانشگاه امام رضا.
ناصری، م.، زهرایی، ب.، پورسپاهی سامیان، ح.، خدادادی، م. و دولت‌آبادی، ن. (1399). ارزیابی روش­های تجربی برآورد جریان در حوضه‌های بدون ایستگاه، نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، 1(32): ۲۴-۱.
Ajmal M., Waseem M., Kim D. & Kim T. W. (2020). A pragmatic slope-adjusted curve number model to reduce uncertainty in predicting flood runoff from steep watersheds. Water, 12(5): 1469-1482.
DOI:10.3390/w12051469
Alizadeh, A. (1387). Principles of Applied Hydrology, Imam Reza University Publications (In persian).
Andrews, R.G. (1954). The use of relative infiltration indices for computing runoff (unpublished). Soil Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas, 6 p.
Babu P. S. & Mishra S. K. (2012). Improved SCS-CN–inspired model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(11): 1164–1172.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000435.
Beven, K. (2012). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, The Primer. A John Wiley and Sons., Ltd., Publication.
Bondelid T. R., McCuen R.H. & Jackson T. J. (1982). Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation. Water Resources Bulletin, 18(1): 111–116.
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb04536.x
Cazier D. J. & Hawkins R. H. (1984). Regional application of the curve number method. Proceedings Specialty Conference, Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. Flagstaff, AZ. abstract p 710.
Chin, D. A. (2021a). Application of the curve-number method for varying rainfall amounts. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 147(7): 06021003.
https://doi .org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001585.
Chin, D. A. (2021b). Deficiencies in the curve number method. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 147(5): 04021008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001552.
Chin, D. A. (2022a). Essential considerations in applying the curve-number method. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 148(2): 04021071.
Chin, D. A. 2022b. Minimum rainfall for applying the curve-number method. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 148(8): 06022003.
https://doi.org/10 .1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001698.
Chin, D. A. 2023. “An improved curve-number method.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 149(2): 06022009.
D’Asaro F., Grillone G. & Hawkins R. H. (2018). Curve number seasonal variation in mid-Mediterranean area. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 144(9): 1943-4774.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001334
Devia, G. K., Ganasri, B. P. and Dwarakish, G. S. (2015). A review on hydrological models. Aquatic Procedia 4: 1001–1007.
Grabau M. R., Hawkins R. H., Ver Wiere K. E. & Slack D. C. (2009). Variety of antecedent runoff conditions for rainfall-runoff with the curve number method. In Proc., 2009 Meetings of the Hydrology Section of the Arizona.
DOI:10.1061/JRCEA4.0001313
Hawkins R. H. (1975). The importance of accurate curve numbers in the estimation of storm runoff. Water Resources Bulletin, 11(5): 887–890.
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1975.tb01810.x
Hawkins R. H. (1980). Infiltration and curve number: Pragmatic and theoretic relationships. In Proc., Watershed Management Symp, New York: ASCE, 925–937.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001755
Hawkins R. H. & Khojeini A. V. (2000). Initial abstraction and loss in the curve number method. Proceedings Arizona Hydrological Society.
Hawkins R. H., Woodward D. E. & Jiang R. (2001). Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio. Proceedings of the USDA-NRCS Hydraulic Engineering Workshop. USDA-NRCS, Washington DC. CA 10pp.
DOI:10.1061/40685(2003)308
Hawkins R. H., Woodward D. E., Hjelmfelt Jr A. T., Van Mullem J. A. & Quan Q. D. (2002). Runoff curve number method; examination of the initial abstraction ratio. Proceedings Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas NV, Jul 28- Aug 1. Session 11b, 12pp.
DOI:10.1061/40685(2003)308
Hawkins R. H., Ward, T. J., Woodward D.E. & Van Mullem J. A. (2009a). Curve number hydrology: State of The Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers.
DOI:10.1061/9780784410042
Hawkins R.H., Ward T.J., Woodward D.E. & Van Mullem J. A. (2009b). ASCE EWRI task committee report on state of the practice in curve number hydrology, 106. Reston, VA: ASCE.
DOI:10.1061/40763(178)150
Hawkins R. H., Ward T.J., Woodward D. E. & Van Mullem J. A. (2010). Continuing evolution of the curve number method. In Proc., Joint Federal Interagency Conf., 10. Las Vegas.
Hawkins R. H., Moglen G. E., Ward T. J. & Woodward D. E. (2020). Updating the Curve Number: Task Group Report. In Proceedings of the Watershed Management 2020: A Clear Vision of Watershed Management—Selected Papers from the Watershed Management Conference2020; American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Reston, VA, USA; pp. 131–140.
DOI:10.1061/9780784483060.012
Hjelmfelt Jr A. T., Kramer L. A. & Burwell R. E. (1982). Curve Numbers as Random Variables. In Rainfall-Runoff Relationship, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO, pp 365-370.
Huang M., Gallichand J., Wang Z. & Goulet M. (2006). A modification to the Soil Conservation Service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrological processes, 20(3): 579–589.
DOI:10.1002/hyp.5925
Huang M., Gallichand J., Dong C., Wang Z. & Shao M. (2007). Use of soil moisture data and curve number method for estimating runoff in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrological processes, 21(11): 1471–1481.
DOI:10.1002/hyp.6312
Jacobs J. M., Myers D.A. & Whitfield B. M. (2003). Improved rainfall/runoff estimates using remotely sensed soil moisture. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(2): 313–324.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04386.x
Jain M. K., Mishra S. K., Babu P.S., Venugopal K. & Singh V. P. (2006). Enhanced runoff curve number model incorporating storm duration and a nonlinear Ia-S relation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(6): 631–635.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:6(631)
Jiang R. (2001). Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio. MS thesis, Watershed Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 120 pp.
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.811077
Kang M. & Yoo C. (2020). Application of the SCS–CN Method to the Hancheon Basin on the Volcanic Jeju Island, Korea. Water, 12(12): 3350-3381.
DOI:10.3390/w12123350
Krajewski A., Sikorska-Senoner A. E., Hejduk A. & Hejduk L. (2020). Variability of the initial abstraction ratio in an urban and an agroforested catchment. Water, 12(2): 415-442.
DOI:10.3390/w12020415
Ling L., Yusop Z., Yap W. S., Tan W. L., Chow M. F. & Ling J. L. (2020). A calibrated, watershed-specific SCS-CN method: Application to Wangjiaqiao watershed in the three Gorges Area, China. Water, 12(1): 60-85.
DOI:10.3390/w12010060
Mishra S. K. and Singh V. P. (1999). Another look at SCS-CN method. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4:257264.
Mishra S. K. & Singh V. P. (2003). Soil Conservation curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0147-1
Mishra S. K., Jain M. K., Babu P. S., Venugopal K. & Kaliappan S. (2008). Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae. Water Resources Management, 22(10): 1409–1420.
DOI:10.1007/s11269-007-9233-5
Mishra, S. K., Kumre, S. K. and Pandey, A. (2019). SCS-CN method revisited in perspective of strange data. Int J Hydrol., 3(4):488–498
Mockus V. (1949). Estimation of Total (and Peak Rates of) Surface Runoff for Individual Storms: Exhibit A, Appendix B, Interim Survey Report, Grand (Neosho) River Watershed. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
Nasseri, M., Zahraie, B., Poorsepahy-Samian, H., Khodadadi, M. and Dolatabadi, N. (2021). Evaluation of Empirical Methods to Estimate Streamflow in Ungauged Basins (Case Study: the Sefidroud Watershed). Geography and Environmental Planning, 32(1): 1-24 (In Persian).
DOI: 10.22108/GEP.2021.125717.1369
Ogrosky, H.O. (1956). Service objectives in the field of hydrology. Unpublished, Soil Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska, 5 pp.
Pandit A. & Heck H. H. (2008). Estimations of SCS curve numbers for concrete and asphalt. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE; 14(4): 335–345.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(335)
Petroselli A., Grimaldi S., Piscopia R. & Tauro F. (2019). Design hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged basins: A comparative assessment of event based (EBA4SUB) and continuous (COSMO4SUB) modelling approaches. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum series Formatio Circumiectus, 18(4): 113–124.
DOI:10.15576/ASP.FC/2019.18.4.113
Ponce V. M. & Hawkins R. H. (1996). Run off curve number: Has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE; 1(1): 11–19.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
Price M. A. (1998). Seasonal variation in runoff curve numbers. M.S. thesis, Dept. of School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Arizona.
Psomiadis E., Soulis K. X. & Efthimiou N. (2020). Using SCS-CN and earth observation for the comparative assessment of the hydrological effect of gradual and abrupt spatiotemporal land cover changes. Water, 12(5): 1386-1400.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051386
Sahu R.K., Mishra S.K. & Eldho T. I. (2012). Improved storm duration and antecedent moisture condition coupled SCS-CN concept-based model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(11): 1173–1179.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000443
Saxton K. E. (1992). User’s Manual for SPAW: A Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Water Model; USDA-ARS: Pullman, WA, USA.
Sharpley A. N. & Williams J. R. (1990). EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Documentation; U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1768; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA.
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2021.1210109
Sherman L. K. Streamflow from rainfall by unit-graph method. Engineering News Record, 108:501–505, 1932.
Shi W. & Wang N. (2020). An improved SCS-CN method incorporating slope, soil moisture, and storm duration factors for runoff prediction. Water, 12(5): 1335-1359.
DOI:10.3390/w12051335
Shi W. H., Huang M. B., Gongadze K. & Wu L. H. (2017). A modified SCS-CN method incorporating storm duration and antecedent soil moisture estimation for runoff prediction. Water Resources Management, 31: 1713–1727.
DOI:10.1007/s11269-017-1610-0
Singh V. P. (1995). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resource Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO.
Sitterson, J., Knightes, C., Parmar, R., Wolfe, K., Avant, B. and Muche, M. (2018). An Overview of Rainfall-Runoff Model Types. International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. 41. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/Stream-C/41.
Soulis K. X. & Valiantzas J. D. (2012). SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds—the two-CN systems approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(3): 1001–1015.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012.
Soulis K. X. & Valiantzas J. D. (2013). Identification of the SCS-CN Parameter Spatial Distribution Using Rainfall-Runoff Data in Heterogeneous Watersheds. Water Resources Management, 27(6): 1737–1749.
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-012-0082-5
Soulis K. X., Ntoulas N., Nektarios P. A. & Kargas G. (2017). Runoff reduction from extensive green roofs having different substrate depth and plant cover. Ecological Engineering, 102: 80–89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.031
Soulis K. X. (2018). Estimation of SCS Curve Number variation following forest fires. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(9): 1332–1346.
DOI:10.1080/02626667.2018.1501482
Soulis, K.X.; Psomiadis, E.; Londra, P.; Skuras, D. A New Model-Based Approach for the Evaluation of the Net Contribution of the European Union Rural Development Program to the Reduction of Water Abstractions in Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7137.
Soulis K. X. (2021). Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) Method: Current applications, remaining challenges, and future perspectives. Water, 13(2): 192-223.
DOI:10.3390/w13020192
Tedela N., McCutcheon S., Campbell J., Swank W., Adams M. & Rasmussen T. (2012). Curve numbers for nine mountainous eastern United States watersheds: Seasonal variation and forest cutting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(11): 1188–1198.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000437
USDA (2004). Natural Resource Conservation Service. NRCS National Engineering Handbook, Part 630, Hydrology.
Williams J., Kannan N., Wang X., Santhi C. & Arnold J. (2012). Evolution of the SCS runoff curve number method and its application to continuous runoff simulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(11): 1221–1229.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000529
Woodward D. E., Hawkins R. H., Jiang R., Hjelmfelt Jr A. T., Van Mullem J. A. & Quan Q. D. (2003). Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. Proceedings World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington DC.
DOI:10.1061/40685(2003)308